|
Who dug the hole?
January 12, 2007
Part 65 Ozone Hole
Joel Akin
If the Ozone Hole were to be tried in a court who would be in charge? If man claims that the Ozone Hole is broken then who should pay if man has broken it? For man is the claimer and the blamer so to blame they have to blame everyone. But what if in this article I tell you that part of the Ozone Hole was broken; and it was broken by two people. you and me.
Now that sounds exactly the same so let me put it another way. I broke it. Now does that help? If it does then you have found someone who takes responsibility for breaking the Ozone Hole. Now I therefore state the US Government needs to take me to court. And in taking me to court they have to prove that I went out of my way to waste resources. Then they have to prove that I went out of my way to waste lives because I was the one responsible for all the storms and all the heat and all the cold and yet not one of those things are related to the Ozone Hole. At least not in a direct way.
So if I were in an investigation I would say “Your honor. The US appellate court is investigating a hole in the North Pole. I claim there is only one real hole that matters. One in the North Pole. Based on my investigation I have proven that that the North Pole is part of the air supply for the entire world. If it is our air supply then why would I be responsible for putting a hole in it?”
The judge would answer “You are not responsible for putting a hole in the Ozone. You are not responsible for anything. Yet if I then say to the people of Japan “Why do you blame me for putting a hole in the Ozone? They have an answer. You were responsible because you purchased CFC’s and other Ozone depleting products.
Then I would say “Is Japan stating that CFC are responsible for the Ozone Hole?” And then Japan has to answer “We supposite that mankind made these CFC’s and they were the real reason why we have two holes in the Ozone at both poles.”
Now as a man who has knowledge I would say CFC’s are not the reason why there are holes at the Ozone Hole. I have created a web page which shows that there are various alternative reasons why there could be holes at the poles. Let us suppose these holes were created long ago by some form of race who existed on earth. Do we then go back and present our supposition to the people who existed? If not then do we blame them who were of this age for the mistake that we claim happened only in our age and only in a short span of time. Thus if you claim CFC’s are the reason then you can point to other holes in the atmosphere.”
The judge will ask if Japan has proof of other holes in the atmosphere. They will state “Negative your honor. There are only two holes. One is at the North Pole and one is at the South Pole.”
So then we are left with a deal which is made with the devil. For there is no answer to anyone who rises up to try and take the two points to a court of law. We people are blamed for not only have two holes on earth but we are blamed because they are meant to be bad. So if those two holes were there 100 years ago we could not prove it. We can only prove that there are two holes now and that those two holes are created by this age. And yet there is no proof of it whereas I have created numerous scenarios based on supposition of history. That a divided earth could have created a hole that split the earth in half. That would have required a great deal of pressure. Yet it would also have created an imbalance in the pressure around the poles because of magnetic flux. If magnetic flux is the part of the story then that indicates there are two points that have been left out. First what is the magnetic flux compared to the rise and fall of Ozone? Second what is the magnetic pull compared to the rise and fall of Ozone.
In addition if this story is true and the people of it were real then who is able to position the two poles so they would have been realigned? For the two poles have to be perfectly centered and that would not be possible in a normal world. Most poles would be off center simply because that would mean the center is the center of the earth.
So if the center of the earth is part of this hypothesis or theory or blame then who is at the center measuring whether or not there are any people there who are playing with the weather. After all if you are at the center of things you would have more control then two holes on the outside.
For example if you create a hole in the atmosphere for a greenhouse you would normally have those two holes there as vents. They would increase the level of heat because of the sun which shines in. So why then are the two poles presently cold? If the greenhouse action is just now melting the poles it seems to me that the poles would be hotter then any other position on earth? Instead they are colder then anywhere else on earth.
In addition the wind is a key factor to the Ozone Layers. It helps the wind position itself to two key factors. First is the layer in which the ozone lies and second is the key to opening a layer so that the wind can find an exit. After all if there are holes you had better believe that air has to escape.
Now if air is escaping why haven’t they pointed that out to the public? Because in any Greenhouse effect the two poles are diametrically opposed. Take North, for example, it is based on the pole of N and the South Pole becomes S for the pole of South. Now if that sounds redundant maybe there is a reason. We are basing things on two suppositions. First there is a hole and second the hole is bad. And that is a supposition not a theory. For if the holes were there and have been there then they must be good. I base that as my supposition and I have more proof for my theory then they have for theirs.
Lets deal with climate change. I’ve talked about the Spiritual or spiritual side of things. Now lets imagine I can explain it in another fashion. One that allows us to understand that we are part of a greenhouse effect created by man. Now lets suppose that is because we have burned our forests and cut down our trees and leveled our land so that farmers don’t have to go up and down when they plant. Now let us suppose history made hills and we used them but in taking them down we took away the protection we once had against storm and peril.
Now if that sounds foolish then what about the time when man went to the moon. What if there were fossils there. Does that prove that man went there to leave those fossils or does it prove that man didn’t mention fossils in any of the data that returned. Yet the surface of the moon is covered with them. Now I have a theory that the moon came from the surface of the earth and was used as a reservoir to hold water. My theory is that the moon came from the earth and that it was carried up by advanced technology so that someday, if earth ever needed it, the moon would provide a means of support. How? By providing us with water that we might lose in an advanced catastrophe. Now if I am right then that would explain fossils.
Now if NASA goes there and finds fossils their theory would be that someone brought them there because the surface is not conducive to growing them. They are right. The Moon is pretty much history and it is capable of an atmosphere but not much of one. The reason is not the size but the weight. It is filled with water and history has shown geysers went off more then once due to an impact on the surface.
Now if I am right someone will find such a reference and they will try to prove me right. Someone will find that there were no references and thus prove me wrong. I believe I am right but only NASA has the proof of fossils from the Moon. They didn’t say anything to us and you are unlikely to get an answer because of this book. But I believe in a few months or years people will ask NASA to release those fossils from the Moon or they will lose their license as a Space Port. How can I say that? Because NASA is part of a cover up of mammoth proportions. No, not hidden mammoths but because they know the universe is filled with radio signals and with signs of life. They just don’t know what to do with it because much of it is about people. And if people are alive out there then who are we? We are small and we are little so they have not told anyone at the White House. Not because they couldn’t but because they know the minute they do the world will know.
So I’m the first to break this news. It is news and it is real and NASA knows it. And they care about it but they are afraid they will all have their empires crushed. So I will say this in their defense that I’ve been their fan since I was a child. There were no other agencies like them and I collected many articles in a scrapbook. Today I write articles on Mars as it might have been with people on my website Mars Outpost. Use Google to find it.
Now the ozone hole is the most controversial story of our age. We call it the greenhouse effect but the fact is it is only a greenhouse that is taking effect. To put it more clearly would be to find the answer man has been searching for, and that means who is responsible for putting a hole there. If man put it there by experimenting with Nuclear weapons then they would think it was their responsibility. Only a sick mind would then blame us and the only reason I can think of is because they are scared. Scared people point the finger at others and if that is their reason they should sit back and relax. Because if chemtrails were started as a means of blocking the sun over North America to curtail the heat then they need to stop.
If people would think then here is the answer they seek. God. God isn’t real is the answer I would hear the most. But the fact is God is the one who showed me all these things. I don’t study the Ozone Hole much and Google is about the gist of it. I personally felt the story created by man is boring. It doesn’t make sense. And perhaps that is one reason people don’t panic. Some might with all the garbage being spread by science. The fact is there is no bad hole at either pole. The fact is the science of the Ozone Hole is coming. And that is going to be in this book and I am going to write it with such a simple explanation no scientists on earth can explain it away. And I don’t have a clue what I am going to say. So if that bothers you then stop reading. Because the answer I give will clear up the mystery. And the answer is straight from a man I call friend. A man who loves you and me and wants this story written so people will understand how it fits into his return to earth. And how we people had better get ready because the Hole is getting wider as God prepares it for the entry of two planets. The first is Paradise and the Second is Eden. And it will arrive soon. Not in years but possibly in months. And I write this as of January 2007 so think of the arrival as being in March.
Now these two planets will be seen and known about by millions on both sides. The government would like to keep this secret so they have to show vast interest in the poles. The fact is they know someone is coming because there is a broadcast warning that sounds like something from Star Trek being heard at both poles. It says “Warning. Clear this region immediately. There are two giant craft on the way through.” Well, that is yet to come but I thought I would just warn you
|